Lit Review Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1a571b5a1
commit
dbf43f202f
4
main.tex
4
main.tex
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ sorting=ynt
|
|||
\addbibresource{mybibliography.bib}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\title{Literature Review }
|
||||
\title{Literature Review}
|
||||
\author{Woon Jun Wei, 2200624}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Monitoring environmental conditions like air quality or wildfire risk is crucial
|
|||
|
||||
Star-based Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have emerged as a popular approach for environmental monitoring, exemplified by Lazarescu et al.'s wildfire detection system \cite{lazarescu_design_2013}. These networks resemble constellations, with individual sensor nodes dispersed like stars and transmitting data to a central gateway node, analogous to a central star. This architecture prioritizes reliable communication, particularly crucial in scenarios like wildfire detection, by utilizing dedicated radio channels within the unlicensed Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band \cite{shah_iot-enabled_2020}. The central gateway node acts as a hub, collecting and buffering data from all sensors before forwarding it to a remote server via the internet.
|
||||
|
||||
Building on this concept, Shah et al. designed a similar system for environmental monitoring, but with sensors directly connected to a computer through a dedicated transceiver pair \cite{shah_iot-enabled_2020}. This simplifies data visualization and sharing, but lacks the centralized structure of the previous approach.
|
||||
Building upon this concept, Shah et al. crafted a similar system, but with sensors directly tethered to a computer through a dedicated transceiver pair \cite{shah_iot-enabled_2020}. This setup streamlines data visualization and sharing, but lacks the centralized structure of its predecessor. Interestingly, star topologies have even ventured into the realm of long-range communication, utilizing technologies like 2G/GSM to shine their light over wider areas \cite{CVZZ16}.
|
||||
|
||||
While Star-based WSNs shine in terms of simplicity and ease of deployment, they face limitations. Scaling them up for wider coverage can be challenging \cite{Boukerche2018Connectivity}. Additionally, research by Shrestha et al. suggests that Mesh networks, with their interconnected nodes and redundant data paths, may offer superior reliability, especially when individual nodes fail \cite{shrestha_performance_2007}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -107,3 +107,6 @@ volume={80},
|
|||
pages={54-69},
|
||||
doi={10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.07.003}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ARTICLE{CVZZ16, author={M. Centenaro and L. Vangelista and A. Zanella and M. Zorzi}, journal={IEEE Wireless Communications}, title={{Long-Range Communications in Unlicensed Bands: the Rising Stars in the IoT and Smart City Scenarios}}, year={2016}, volume={23}, keywords={Internet of Things;Smart Cities;Low-Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN);LoRa; SIGFOX;Ingenu;Cellular IoT}, month={October}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue